Search results

My concern with the insurance mechanic is the possibility to duplicate ships without owning the blueprint. For those like me who sell ships only (no blueprints) further more numbered and limited ships, this is a game breaking feature. The fact that you could just insurance a ship you own, get a...

I want this and i want it now.

Post posts a post post.

You are right about calming down, I obviously posted this thread out of frustration with the major failures the developers keep producing. You are not right at all about "You also don't respond with arguments..." That is utter bullshit. Since I'm getting very tired with the game, I have no...

Whenever you bring up the "it was there on PTU for a long time", you immediately discredit yourself. Returning players don't care about PTU, they never did, nor most of the active players do. In fact, the existence of the PTU is a major contributor to the game being a failure. Neither you nor...

Flying again, sure. Rebuilding it without just slamming a heatsink onto it that completely ruins the looks and the center of mass takes a lot more time. We have a repair button, so why not have at least a 1-time possibility to "repair" the ships into a chosen blueprint. Sigh... What if I...

I totally expressed in my original post that I'm fine with the changes, all I'm asking is a little help, as I don't want and will not spend hours/ship to manually rebuild or even scrap... manually. A one-time reassembly to a chosen blueprint is perfectly reasonable to ask to help players adjust...

I don't have 50 stranded ships, i have 0 stranded ships. Sure i can solve ALL my problems in game, by spending 2-3 hours / ship to rebuild them to the desired version that id rather just do with a push of a button as a reassembly or "repair" to a chosen blueprint. (No, not the 3 slots thing)

That would be awesome, would solve my personal problem. About the difference cost, you should be able to precraft the parts to minimize or even nullify the cost of the difference. My point here is that this is unnecessarily punishing players who are already fed up with tasks taking way too much...

The problem with this is you and others like you treat the game as finished. According to you, this is the intended gameplay. So... we should be expecting ever and forever ship breaking updates because this is what Starbase is about, fixing our ships broken by developers - according to you. I'm...

Well, okay, I am salty, yes. I wrote demanding rather than suggesting, yes. The reason for that is because they show that they are 100% incompetent to bring Starbase to success and its such a waste. It is easy to criticize and say I could have done everything better, I'm aware of that, however...

Btw. "you and at least 9000 other people" :ROFLMAO:

Except you never even had an argument, your first comment was straight to insult. Oh dear.

200 players.

I obviously deserve the means to recover all my ships since NON OF THEM are in working condition because of the developers. You talk in terms like the game is fully finished and recovering some ships those I couldn't anyway matter. No, it doesn't matter, disrespecting people's time and forcing...

Dear developers, you broke all our ships! Not just with the heatsinks but also the (not anymore) pulsing mining lasers! It's okay! BUT we need you to respect our time if you want us to spend time in your game enjoying your game so we can tell others that the game is good. We need an easy and...

Since we - including the possible returning players - need to refit all our ships with heatsinks we need this: -Every existing ship prior to the update those aren't stored in a dev station (like origin) receives a 1 time only free tow ticket no matter where or how far the ships are. -Every...

A mandatory special feature to ease the frustration with the new mechanics rendering ALL SHIPS literally useless: Every existing ship prior to the update those aren't stored in a dev station (like origin) receives a 1 time only free tow ticket no matter where the ships are. You can tow it from...

@LauriFB Yup, I second the above, please!? :)

:unsure: