Search results

Continuous shooting is not the target, but the result. We don't need these guns to shoot at the same time, so the fire continuity is too low.

The batteries are great, and we don't have to turn on the weapons all the time

It's so cool!

As shown in the video "rotating stage"?

In fact, it's not necessary, but it's a little more convenient -- believe me, it's really just a little bit. When designing difficult ships, we have to rely on the most primitive method -- keep trying!

[waiting for embargo to end because I have a ton problem and a grumpy idea]

For a team of 200 people who run, collect and trade day and night, a ship with 30 electromagnetic cannons may be as cheap and handy as disinfectant.

Long distance identification of enemy and me should be distinguished by formation, while short distance identification of enemy and me should be accomplished by distinguishing ship type, and there will be no situation of chasing friendly forces.

Can the intermittent change of the auxiliary thrust of the extra rocket maintain a relatively long period of time, and the speed of adding resistance to the system can not keep up with the speed of thrust change?

This is a very good function. Maybe we can use 3D printing technology to print out our own ships after export to keep them as souvenirs.

A small amount of asteroid debris may not be able to block each other's progress. The hull can fully withstand a small amount of debris impact. Too small debris will also be deleted. It is not a good choice to mine in the open area.

Can 10 people dig meteorite for two hours to buy a super big ship? Is this too cheap?

Do you mean the napalm burner? Or the warhead of a shell with high-temperature thermite? Or "Greek fire"?

I think even in PVP, good design will emerge in endlessly, just like the new tactics of modern war with new vehicles, the same materials, different combinations, forming different ships, they have their own applicable environment. A good commander and spaceship designer is the key to success.

What you said makes perfect sense. Good design may converge slightly, but there will definitely be completely different details.

From the perspective of the third person perspective, I agree with you. This is really dangerous.

The point is not whether its design can be used, but whether it is the best. This requires thousands of adjustments, and each time a new one is used for destructive testing. I am afraid it is economically difficult to support. What we want to pursue is not to let the ship fire with kinetic...

It might be like this for poor companies hahaha

I think SB is very attractive, and finding thousands of people to participate in the war is not a problem.

This is what I want to say, this is the real "script farm".