Search results

Your statement is true, however strafing is greatly underused and I don't know anyone from my friends who uses it in battles like I do. Until we have mouse controls, strafing will be a greatly underused technique that not many will use and even less people will master.

As far as I've seen, they're random patterns of "go up at x rate every shot"

Flip-n-burn is what they call that maneuver. Most effecient way of slowing down, so long as you have good pitch or yaw.

But please, please, let me format my if statements ;-;

big slow, big bulky, big clunky. welcome to yolol.

I mean "rare" stuff will fluctuate everywhere, in some places onium is common and in others not, so as a result in some places fighters are more likely to have one plating or another. How would getting terrorised by a group of people who worked hard to find a rare metal to plate their ships with...

I feel that not only are most ores sort of boring-looking, that the effects should be swapped around a bunch. For example nhurgite has super low base value, while corazium has very high value. Nhurgite has this fancy glowy green color, while corazium is a barely-shining greeny-emerald color. In...

Devs have mentioned that they are thinking about A. Making batteries damage other objects nearby upon explosion (doing just barely enough damage to blow up any nearby batteries >:3) and B. Putting an output cap on batteries. This would make ships that want to have this large amount of weapons...

Having to check in every other week and re-bind your lot might be a good idea. Or some sort of check-in system where if you don't turn up at your lot for a long time, someone can snatch it. (as someone who missed the Proia patch going live...)

Great progress!

Came here to say the same thing :D They're so good I can't distinguish between ones you've made and ones made by the devs!

Welcome to the Universe!

I mean technically not allowing any controls during camera viewing is still a restriction of the camera... I think that a lower refresh rate of output is a bit better. It still heavily damages combat capabilities, while still allowing cameras to be rear- or alternative-view viewports from which...

Would ya look at that, I go away for half a week and a great thread blows up! Amazing timing from kiiyo, once again. Anyways I'm seeing some amazing suggestions here. And you know what? My opinion has changed. I voted for yes (limited)! I think that if cameras are made to have a super low...

Good news, flak cannons are most likely the next weapon to hit PU! Their model is nearly done, you can see a pair of them in the MAG shop, just functionality that's left I think!

I think you could already do something like that, so long as you have a couple receivers and ships that are transmitting a message on the frequency of the transmitter. Of course, if they're the enemy, I doubt they'd be transmitting anything, so this antennae thingy would only work for ships...

I'll stand by my use of most. However, I see your point, and I do agree that the developers make their own decisions, it should always be like that. However on the argument side of things... eh let's not get into the details of that in this thread. I feel that the arguments are very reasonable...

I'd like to see some sort of weapon that disables or severely decreases functionality of parts. For example if you hit a group of thrusters with this weapon, some thrusters in an area around the point of impact will turn off/severely underperform for a period of time. I can see it being some...

More devices are planned, although most of the community is strongly against the inclusion of cameras.

Might be a bit dissapointing when you make it in-game. Although max-speed ships do feel fast, they don't allow you to zoom from station to station in seconds. The only thing that comes close to that experience is the chairdrive exploit, allowing you to travel at ~400 m/s.