Search results

Well, I really dislike this idea because the safe zone is big enough already as it is (~10,000,000 cubic kilometers, at least a third of it intersecting with the belt) so there is not really a need to cater to players in terms of safety even more. Also, the odds of being found in a cloud are...

No. And if it were possible it would mean that Capital Ships were limited to a top speed of 150 m/s which'd defeat their purpose kinda.

Or they put it 300km away into the middle of nowhere so nobody ever shows up kek

Usually there is a video by Kenetor every week after the progress report drops which explains everything quite well. Most times (not for week 41 though) its the first post in the progress report.

The changes here are all nice and dany but there are still a lot of optimizations due for the Ship Designer Workshop, especially more detailed error messages and the bridging of gaps between beams that occur when using special beams. It sometimes almost feels random when every beam seems to be...

I prefer the term "realistic" instead of "dismissive". Also, a casual player is defined by the very fact that he is not dedicated to the game (which is not a bad thing). It is not that I dislike them in any way. In fact, I want them to participate and let them have their 20 or 30 minutes of fun...

This is simply not true. Of course you could "slowly expand" with this method if needed. Also, a game is usually centered around what the players want if it is meant to be successful. Casual players aren't the ones that will build a whole station my man. These people just want to log in, fly...

It avtually looked like this:

Dude, okay, now I am really glad that they replaced it with Easy Build Mode. Jeez, I could not imagine playing with such a messy designer ;)

Something big just hit my update queue. But why on a friday? Are devs gonna be there if something happens over the weekend? Anyways, let's see what's it all about!

There was a station designer back then in closed alpha.

The reason why practically no game I ever played featured lengthy stays in a prison environment is because I would simply tell the whole game "so long, suckers." and be off to play another game. It is preposterous to assume that people would actually serve their time. Prison is a terrible idea...

I like this whole suggestion bar one flaw. If the safe zone is larger than, say 500-1000 meters, attacking forces would be able to mass up inside the safe zone until they could basically zerg rush the defending faction making it unsustainable to defend the gate because there is no way to prevent...

TL;DR The Game has big issues, alpha state doesn't excuse them, Easy Build Mode is bad, FBs priorities seem to be way off, safe zones are too large. In the eyes of the customers, this game has launched yet. It even explicitely says it in the Early Access Launch Trailer. Also, please give us a...

Hmm, interesting idea. I will keep that in mind. I have a pretty good idea of its location (At if I remember it correctly.). Could be worth the trip, but might take some time!

I wouldn't rely on it. If this game is ever supposed to be logical, the logical answer is that this is indeed a bug. But who knows, maybe converting infra-red light may be enough to power a whole station :sneaky:

This is a good idea although very complex to implement. +1 Anyways!

Amazing. I want to explore moons in the near future too ^^

This would make Markka (and P2P trades) a lot more attractive! I like it.

Honestly, I do not see any reason why I need to be forced bolt these components together manually (which is really just a frustrating and time consuming business). Yes, there is autobolt, but the problem with that is that it exhausts the bolt limit (31,000 bolts) rather quickly. So, for any...