Search results

Doesn't fix combat logging, only slightly delays it. Also immersion breaking. Is there even one reason why bodies shouldn't stay in game outside safe zones?

It's about logging off/in, not respawning. While it sounds similar, let's not derail the thread. IMO log-off chamber option is a must, we all agree on that. But I also think that bodies outside of safe zone should stay in game, fully lootable, destructible, moveable, ect. I don't want...

That was answered somewhere by dev. Tanks are pressurised, so they will most likely just explode. Pipes can leak.

While there is some hardcap, it's so hard to reach that it's more of a softcap. You simply won't reach 150mps without dedicated unarmed race speeder. Also there is armour angle mechanics, which helps wedges more than shoeboxes.

Yolol. Transmitter on your small ship need to send password into void. Then yolol on the big ship checks if password is correct. If yes, it sends possition. Of course someone could listen and log both of these calls. But you can try to encrypt them.

I think (hope) that we'll also get equilateral triangles. After all with 90 and 45 degree frames that's what is needed for corners and inverted corners.

Afaik answer: You can design and build your ship anywhere by hand. Ship editor/sandbox, if implemented, will only make it slightly faster to design (due to tools like symmetry, copy-paste, ect. I hope). It seems that frame block need to follow kind of grid (intended connection points and 90 deg...

Large weaponry actually favours small-medium glass-cannon ships. Because those usually have high range, penetration and damage, which are more useful against large, slow targets. Keeping the weapons small makes sure that armour (one of few fields where large ships are naturally better) matters...

1:17 "There are mountable versions of some of the tools" which indicates separate tools, not using hand tools.

Good point about megastations. But I still think noobs should have some way to design, even if quite limited. Just to increase their desire to get better version. Limitations of megastation DHs: -pre-build (on common plots, rather than private) -transparent (no secret building at all, everyone...

AFAIK they can't hold hand objects. Just specially-designed ship version of tools. That's reason for the suggestion.

Following that mindset there is no such thing as griefing in games at all. After all by teamkilling you establish your position as the person with the highest score, by preventing others from doing so, which may be your personal goal. Or shooting naked people at the beach in dayz. @Atreties do...

I like the visual aspect of it. But it wouldn't be me without spotting some possible improvements. 1. Last line could be divided into two: manufacturer and designer 2. All those tiny PD turrets that are in group of 2 will limit each other line of fire. They are also easier targets because of...

I'm all for parts that have distinct function, rather than being purely cosmetics. That would be a way to create custom classes. (like sniper with stabilised arms to reduce sway or assault with forearm-mounted grappling hook) But I'm absolutely against upgrades. Side-grades are always more fun.

There is no such thing as PvP for the sake of PvP. There is always a reason. Hypotetical situation of you attacking newbie on space scouter flying somewhere with a gun-loaded frigate. Is it an challenge to you? No. He has no chance. Material gain? No. He has nothing. Desire for respect? No...

It's a hot topic recently. Between those who want ship design to be long and thus creating sense of accomplishment, and those who prefer to do it fast and efficiently. I won't hide that I belong to the other group, but I'll try to come up with idea that at least address some other valid...

With offline protection most of the time. With ships when someone besiege it. Stationary turrets may kind of work, but would be super easy to snipe. Same problem as with huge ships.

Can we get rid of post count ranking in the form of members titles? It bring nothing and encourage spam. 120 seconds seems like a bit much. Is there any way to make it a bit more complex? Like each post adds 150 to your spam-meter, and you can't post if it's over 120. So you can reply twice...

Could we please get more meaningful choices? -only like/agree, without scoreboard -both like/agree and dislike/disagree, without scoreboard -only like/agree, with scoreboard -both like/agree and dislike/disagree, with scoreboard -none And remove biased text about option for none if you want to...

Likes are useful. Same for disagree buttons. Any kind of leaderboards should be removed. Including the title given for amount of posts.